The Crumbling New World Order

This image is claimed as fair dealing under Australian copyright law. The tower of Babel all over again.

The definition of 'new world order' that we will work with here is the political definition which is:

The term "new world order" has been used to refer to any new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power.

The current new world order in play is the one the Bush family introduced in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. On the domestic level there was a plan to destroy two classes; the working class, by destroying their unions and exporting their jobs overseas and the middle class by hijacking their property and savings.

On the foreign policy front the Bush's went on the dictum of creating new theatres of war globally and going after an enemy that unlike a nation-state has no borders, namely, terror groups. 9/11 was supposed to be the Bush administration's magnificent triumph of creating new political thought through the concept of terror, to regain balance of power for the United States to make the 21st century the new American century. Their problem was that the Clinton administration had already secured the balance of power in favour of the United States. So none of this was necessary.

The Bush strategy failed to maintain the balance of power for the United States but their new world order stratagem continues to be at play irrespective of who is in the Oval Office. What kind of tyranny is this? In retrospect this new world order of terror has damaged US interests and the balance of power now rests with Russia and its allies. The reason for this squarely lies in the fact that the US State Department begrudgingly refuses to abandon the Bush project for the new American century and pushes every post-Bush administration to take it on board.

The answer is clear; the war on terror has failed to advance US interests and it should be dismantled immediately. The Obama administration, was however right to clear the Arab World of old dictators like Mubarak and Gaddafi. They were also right in leading the 5+1 deal with Iran. If all of these achievements were upheld and fortified by Obam than Russia wouldn't have picked up the pieces the US left lying around. Currently the US has lost Egypt, Libya, Syria, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, part of the Ukraine and is about to lose Iran as allies and friends in the region. The best way to illustrate the gravity of this is to recall the boardgame 'Risk' and the risk is great indeed because these losses could have been avoided if the US desisted in perpetuating a war of terror, where terror groups and rebel groups were wrongly supported in Syria against Assad, in Iraq against the current regime and in Libya against the revolutionary movement there.

Why support Saudi backed terror?

Your guess is as good as ours but we have a a couple of ideas on answering this one. It's kind of an either/or scenario. Either the Bush mandate is still supported by the entire American political community OR the international community which controls and oversees Middle East operations and nations cannot seem to agree on establishing a workable new Marshall Plan for the region similar to the original plan to rebuild Europe after World War II.